XIV
With the problems that invariably arise from
within such a large structure as a national economy, the
controller of such a structure will seek to enforce their
will upon those within the structure by way of certain
bodies of enforcement, to ensure that everything within
the structure is as the oppressor wishes it to be.
In the instance of crime, as we have seen, the
only reason the controller of any structure needs to
resort to punishing any person for 'doing wrong', failing
to conform, is when they have failed to reward them for 'doing
right', conformed. Though as in all such instances, such
actions aren't realistically possible on the grounds that
as and when all individuals within the structure conform
to whatever image the oppressor lays down, no oppression
is forthcoming from such a structure, therefore leading
to no power. And with no threats of oppression (poverty)
being waved over people in order to force them to conform,
there is no reason why they should.
This is seen within the economy, in instances
such as the job interview. As and when such a time occurs
when somebody finds themselves within such a relationship,
they will find themselves having to conform to an image
as set by the oppressor (interviewer), in order that they
may experience reward within such a relationship. There
invariably come claims from the interviewer along the
lines of "We're looking for a certain kind of person",
etc. It is a certain kind of image that they are looking
for, and, as such, anyone wanting that job will have to
conform to that image, and if they fail to do so, they
will not get the job, and will therefore experience no
reward within that relationship.
It is principles such as these which are
responsible for the large number of people possessing 'hello
may I help you' type telephone personalities, as anyone
who has had any form of interaction with those who seem
to be disturbingly reminiscent of an overanimated
ventriloquists dummy will be aware. In the case of that
particular business, that is the image which oppressor
laid down, leading to those that wished to experience
reward within that relationship finding themselves forced
to adopt such traits, in order that they would get the
job in the first place.
More disturbingly still, whilst such a strange
and downright weird personality may seem odd in an
example such as a bank worker dealing with a customer
transaction, with their 'hello, I'm your friend' type
smile, and their 'I really like you' manner, such actions
are downright scary when the same worker dealing with the
same customer, with regards the inability to keep up the
mortgage payments, states "I'm sorry, we shall be
repossessing your house shortly, please vacate the
premises and live in the gutter forthwith. Thank you.",
with the same 'hello I'm your friend' type smile, and the
same 'I really like you' type manner.
Such principles are seen in the example of
somebody turning up for a job interview stating facts
along the lines of "It is a piss easy job, which a
blindfolded monkey could do. I foresee no problems in
performing such tasks". Such claims, whilst they
maybe, and often are, true, are certainly not going to
get the applicant the job. A direct result of which means
that as far as this particular relationship is concerned,
they will experience no reward, and if they continue to
adopt such blatantly honest tactics, they probably never will.
Though, as mentioned previously, that isn't
the be all and end all of it, there are only a certain
number of vacancies above the point of balance, and
therefore even when such a time occurs whereby that
particular poor person does conform to the image, all the
places will have been taken, leading to an adaptation of
the image, or even an outright change, whereby such a
person, despite conforming, will still find themselves
existing within the oppressive boundaries of poverty
anyway, as the oppressor wages war against inflation.
As seen before, as and when such a time occurs
whereby such a person fails to receive any legitimate
form of reward from any relationship, then they will set
out and seek it elsewhere in a manner which, from the
controllers point of view, is illegitimate, i.e. crime,
with the same principles being used to combat it.
As in the instance of going up the economic
ladder, whereby individuals were rewarded with a step up
whenever they conformed, thereby experiencing a decrease
in oppression, the principles are utilised by the
controller of the structure in reverse, kicking people
down the ladder, as and when they do not conform, thereby
experiencing an increase in oppression.
In the instance of crime, those living in
poverty must do so in order that the required amount of
riches, and subsequent power, are forthcoming from that
structure, in order that it may be dished out at the top,
in whatever manner the controller of the structure sees
fit. As and when such a time occurs whereby certain
persons living under such economic conditions refuse to
accept their placing within the structure, they will be
punished until they do.
This is achieved in modern day society through
incarceration, whereby those that refuse to accept
whatever level of oppression was being forced upon them
by the oppressor, are forced to experience higher levels
of oppression until such a time, as they hopefully accept
the lower levels of oppression, as a lesser of two evils.
Much in the same manner as a parent who locks their child
in a room for being naughty, naughty itself being nothing
more than behaving in a manner deemed inappropriate by
the parent. That child will learn that as and when any
time occurs whereby they have been naughty, or at least
caught for being naughty, they will be locked in a room
until such a time as they promise not to do it again (or
more commonly to serve a fixed tariff of time). We
therefore see that poverty itself, is merely nothing more
than an open prison, full of innocent people. Maybe not
to the extremities of a fully blown prison, if only for
the fact that the people within it are free to roam as
they please, yet they can't actually do anything, owing
to the fact that they have no money.
The reversed processes of punishing someone
who has failed to conform, as opposed to rewarding them
when they have conformed, are seen most vividly in the
trial of any defendant. It is within such a trial, that
the judge will invariably ask the defendant whether they
plead guilty or not guilty. And seeing as punishment is
the primary means of communication within such a
relationship, the answer is more often than not, not
guilty, if only for the fact that a rough translation of
the statement equates to, "Do you wished to be
punished, yes or no?".
Once again, an image is held up, in this
instance by the judge, and in the example of the
interview whereby reward would be found if the image was
conformed to, in the example of the trial, punishment
will be found if the image is not conformed to. This is
seen most evidently, in the fact that someone who bleats
to the judge that they are really sorry for what they
have done, and regret the incident with the utmost
sincerity, will be punished far less, if at all, in
relation to the individual proudly stating "I
enjoyed the experience greatly, so much so in fact, that
I have every intention of repeating it at the first
available opportunity", who coincidentally, would be
punished far more than the first defendant, despite the
fact that the only difference between the two, may well
have been that the second told the truth.
Now that the oppressor has set the national
structure, leaving little or no room, for those below the
point of balance to experience any legitimate form of
reward, owing to the anti inflationary measures that
would be adopted as and when such people start climbing
the economic ladder. And with the oppressor clamping down
on all illicit forms of reward with the necessary
increase in policing. As and when the levels of
oppression become to great, the oppressed are invariably
left with only one course of action to take. Just as in
the case of the abused wife, who is refused any
alleviation of oppression, and also refused
the option of simply walking away from the relationship,
on the grounds that the abusive husband will be left with
no power, is subsequently left with only one course of
action. They must kill their oppressor. Revolution.
Though such actions won't be looked upon
favourably by the oppressor. And in both the above,
such actions will invariably be met with stiff
resistance, leading to excessively high levels of
oppression by way of a stern beating being dished out by
the oppressor upon his people. Much in the same manner as
the rape victim who attempts to fight off the rapist will
be beaten relentlessly until she submits to the will of
the oppressor. Interestingly enough, we see in all the
above examples, politicians, abusive husbands, rapists,
as and when such a time occurs when those they control
attempt to kill them, they won't stop and think "Hold
on a minute, this isn't right, my people are trying to
kill me. Maybe I'm doing something wrong". If the
oppressed refuses to buckle down and accept their
oppression, then they shall be beaten until they do, in
whatever manner the oppressor sees fit, with the
controller of the national structure turning guns on his
own people if necessary, and blowing their heads clean
from their shoulders.
Copyright Sean Copland 1995-2010
|