XVII
Now that we possess a greater understanding of
the world we live in, and everything that entails, namely
relationships, cult worship, religion, commerce,
economics, and politics, and everything that they involve,
domination, manipulation, guidance, sacrifice,
development, consumerism, inflation, riches, poverty,
crime, war, capitalism, socialism, communism, and such
forth, we see that they are nothing more than different
languages, each conforming to the same basic principles,
with regards the evolutionary development of life forms,
owing to the fact that they are nothing more than
interactions between higher life forms. Interactions
which, as in all instances, may ultimately be backtracked
to the base act of murder, be that interaction the act of
murder itself, or indeed a relationship of any shape,
size, or form, however brief.
Looking back upon such principles, and their
manifestations in the lives of every individual, and
indeed every higher life form, upon the planet, we can
now answer the question that has baffled so many for so
long. What is the meaning of life?
The answer is simple, it is the question that
is important, and it is a pretty big question. There is a
reason why people ask it. The fact of the matter is, it
doesn't matter what you do, or where you go, you will
always end up asking such a question, as and when you
come to the inevitable conclusion that whatever the
meaning of life is, whatever it is that you are currently
doing certainly isn't it. The question is most commonly
followed, with similar questions along the lines of
"There's got to be more to life than this?".
And there is, a lot more, and in reading this book, you'll
have probably already realised that.
In asking such a question you have more than
likely come to the legitimate conclusion that you are
being abused, be it economically, emotionally,
spiritually, or quite literally. You are being controlled
and subsequently dominated within an abusive relationship,
which has inevitably led to the asking of the question
"What is the meaning of life", and now that we
understand the question, we see that the answer is a
simple one. Simply by backtracking on all available
relationships, in all their incarnations, we will
inevitably root out a single common denominator,
something that is missing in every single relationship,
something which should be there but isn't. Leading us
ultimately to the answer...
Freedom. It doesn't matter where you go, or
what you do, you're not free. Nobody is. The fact of the
matter is, you are living smack bang in the middle of an
evil Nazi cult, ruled over by Satan, and everybody has been brainwashed.
That's not as sensationalist a claim, as it
first may seem. All relationships by the vary fact that
they are interactions between higher life forms, may be
backtracked to the act of murder, and reveal the current
level of development of the most dominant party with
regards that relationship, and their position relative to
the constants of base instinct (Satan), and conscience (God).
And as we have seen, cults, business, economics, politics,
they are merely different implementations of the same
game, different languages. And with everyone experiencing
their respective levels of reward and punishment with
regards the development of their personality, from the
controllers of such structures, in all their
manifestations, we see that those levels are not true (at
least not in a truly natural sense). And with the
controlling individuals revealing that they are
invariably hovering around the lower regions of external
consciousness, we see that they are more 'in tune' with
the voice of the inner beast, than of conscience.
When looking at any of the structures that are
conjured up in modern day society, and the effects that
they have upon those within them, we see disturbing
levels of corruption occurring with regards the
personalities of the individuals concerned, as the levels
of reward and punishment experienced by people as a whole,
are effectively tampered with by the controllers of the
structures concerned, resulting in the people existing
within the structure, to all intents and purposes, being brainwashed.
We see perfect examples in the various cases
as illustrated before, i.e. "If we work hard, we
shall be rewarded" which, as explained before,
simply is not true. We see those above the point of
balance crying "Why should we provide benefits,
health care etc.", these people genuinely believe
that they are doing poor people a favour, and as
explained before, that simply is not true. We hear claims
of "We must obey the law, for the law protects us",
which again, is simply not true. The law is whatever the
controller of the structure wants it to be, in the case
of the rapist, the law is for the victim to take it like
the bitch she is, and if the law, which after all is
nothing more than the will of the oppressor, genuinely
protects, then why does the oppressor himself, abuse the
people within that structure. Where is the law when the
controller decides that he requires higher levels of
power, and therefore sets about creating higher levels of
oppression, by way of decreasing minimum standards of
living, and cutting health care for instance, refusing
life saving surgery, the denial of an incubator to a
premature baby etc. That is the law. It is the will of
the oppressor. And once again, people believe it. The
policemen and judges for one, just like they believed in
rounding the Jews up for slaughter, and crucifying the
son of God, they were upholding the law, and what's more they believed it.
The hospital managers who refuse to treat the
premature baby, the elderly person, the smoker, in the
name of cutbacks, they believe in what they do, if they
didn't, then they simply wouldn't do it, nobody's got a
gun at their heads, they're free to leave, and henceforth
refuse to be party to such atrocities, any time they so please.
None of these people are going to stand for
trial for what they do. Nobody's going to arrest them,
and place them before any courts of decency charged with
crimes against humanity.
Such principles, whilst being incredibly
disturbing, are quite normal under the circumstances,
especially so amongst the more inadequate members of
society (who have a strange habit of climbing, or rather
crawling, rapidly within such structures owing, primarily,
to their bizarre gift of total lack of free thought).
None of these people are experiencing any form of
punishment for what they do, therefore, in their opinion,
they can't be doing anything wrong. Furthermore, they
experience reward for what they do, by way of a pay
packet, promotion, badges etc., therefore, in their
opinion, they must be doing something right. Leading to
their own perceptions of reality becoming incredibly distorted.
Looking at the example of a child, that has
been given free reign by its parent to go and beat a dog
with a stick, free in the knowledge that if the dog dares
bite him, it will be punished by the parent, such a child
will be blissfully unaware of the fact that they are
doing anything wrong. They are certainly not doing
anything illegal within the context of that relationship.
They beat the dog with their parents blessing, and if
they get a pat on the back for doing so, then they'll be
all the more convinced that they are doing something
right. And, as and when such a time occurs when the dog
decides it's had enough, and turns around and bites the
child, the child, in his arrogance, will run bleating to
his parent, demanding that the dog be punished for daring
to stand up to him, and would shun completely the thought
that maybe they got what they deserved, maybe, if you go
around beating dogs on the head with sticks, they bite
you, maybe it's normal.
Looking back at the case of the hospital
manager, we see the same pattern emerging, when the
hospital manager refuses treatment for a premature baby (or
indeed anyone), on the grounds that the hospital simply
don't want to spend any of their money on the child,
though obviously such actions will come wrapped up in a
package of complete bullshit. As and when a legitimately
angry parent, grabs such a manager and beats and kicks
the absolute shit out of such a baby killing pervert, the
manager won't think he's done anything wrong. He'll go
running to the police demanding this man be punished with
complaints of "He's a nutter, he should be locked up".
Though in reality, as in most such circumstances, it's
not the victim who should be locked up, but the
perpetrator, i.e. the hospital manager, his colleagues,
and their perverted leaders, the politicians.
The police force is a fine example within any
nation of how such principles corrupt the personalities
of those involved. Looking at the example of rioting, as
and when the police deal with such a situation, they will
invariably use brute force in order to quell the
disturbance, deeming them just as guilty as those they
are fighting, only more so on the grounds that the police
fight beat and abuse with immunity. The rioters are
arrested, placed before a judge, and sentenced for their
actions, the police on the other hand, despite being just
as guilty of the exact same actions with regards violence,
are most certainly not arrested, and not punished (note
when such rioting occurs, and the police beat any
individual, they're not doing so in order to restrain
that particular individual, in the name of public safety,
in order that they may arrest him, and drag him off to
court, more a case of them simply beating anyone they
come across, irrespective of whether or not such a person
has genuinely committed any offence). Such actions are
repeated in the fact that the policeman will receive a
far lesser sentence, if at all, for beating a man in the
street, in comparison to the man in the street for beating a policeman.
In the most extreme of instances, we see
examples such as those in South American countries (Brazil
etc.), whereby the police actively set out and shoot dead
street children, as young as five in some instances.
Whilst it may not be explicitly written in law, the fact
of the matter remains, that these children are second
class citizens and, as such, are subject to the hatred of
the first class citizens. Therefore, as and when any such
children are executed by the murderers within the police
force, no eyebrows are raised and, by and large, such
people will believe that the child deserved to die anyway.
They refused to buckle down and accept their place, and
when no legitimate form of reward was forthcoming from
the structure they found themselves in, they set about
attempting to experience illegitimate forms of reward, i.e.
stealing, therefore they must be punished.
Exactly the same principles are forthcoming
from the execution squads that exist within the British
police force. Again, it may not be written in law, but
the fact of the matter remains, in some instances, they
go out to kill second class citizens. The common instance
of shooting dead robbers with replica guns is testament
to that. No doubt, if any questions are asked, the
policeman concerned will bleat on about how he feared for
his life, and how he had no way of knowing it was a fake
gun, but then he would wouldn't he. The fact that the
police have guns at all is proof of their disturbing
intentions, a complete bullet proof outfit is far more
suitable if it's self defence they're after, only it
doesn't allow for any potential criminals to be shot dead
on the spot. And once again, when the first class
citizens above the point of balance hear or witness such
a thing, by and large they won't be too bothered, as they
believe that the robber deserved to die anyway. Again,
the robber failed to experience legitimate reward within
the structure he resided in, and as and when he set out
to experience reward in an illegitimate manner, he was
executed. There'll be no trial for the policeman, in fact
he'll probably get a badge.
Though it must be said that it is not all
second class citizens that these people hate, the ones
who buckle down and accept their place are acceptable
enough (provided they don't start drinking in their pubs,
clubs, living in their areas etc.). It is the ones who
refuse to buckle down they really hate. Just as the
rapist doesn't hate the victim who allows him to rape her,
at least not as much as he does the victim who refuses
him, and just as the business man doesn't hate his
customer, at least not as much as the customer who refuses to pay.
The same principles manifest themselves
everywhere. For example, looking at the example of a pop/film
star, with them finding themselves swamped in reward, and
being surrounded by people telling them they're so clever
and talented, it is then no wonder that they start to
believe it all, especially so, when they have experienced
little or no real input with regards reward and
punishment outside of that relationship, leading to the
same high levels of arrogance, and ultimately hatred for
those around them. This point is clearly shown in the
numerous examples of just such big stars surrounding
themselves with bodyguards, as they swan amongst their
fans, like royalty amongst the peasants. They'll
invariably state that they love their fans, just as the
king and the politicians will state that they love their
people, so much so in fact that they employ numerous
people to keep the 'dirty little peasants' away from them.
Such principles are quite normal under the
circumstances, as is the reverse. When an individual
experiences high levels of punishment within any given
relationship, and are surrounded by people telling them
they are pathetic and worthless etc. it is then perfectly
normal to believe such information, especially so, as
they have experienced nothing that would leave them to
believe anything else.
Such actions are prevalent near on everywhere
in society, especially so in the areas of first class
employment. The film industry for instance would have the
common man believe that the actors and actresses involved
are in some way talented, gifted, special etc. and yet
common-sense states that we were all actors and actresses,
when we were small and we played doctors and nurses,
mummies and daddies, cowboys and Indians, cops and
robbers etc. only then we were more talented, gifted,
special etc. on the grounds that we made it up as we went
along, in one long seamless effort, no need to memorise
scripts, rehearse etc. a talent which the modern day
icons of the silver screen invariably lack. To the
children involved, it is nothing more than playing, yet
as they grow and develop, they will become aware that
talking out of your backside more often than not leads to
an increase in their standard of living, as their fans
ooh and aah, as they recite their tales of talent to the
paying public, "It was quite scary really, the
character I was playing had such a deep and complex
persona, that I found myself saying/doing things, then I'd
stop and think, hey, that's not me, it's my character. It
almost took me over. It was really intense". Which
just goes to show what a shallow little shit they are,
and an untalented one at that. They read a script, and
their entire personality is thrown out of the window, and
is replaced by mere words that they have read. But once
again, they believe that they are talented, gifted,
special, and in doing so, they also believe that everyone
else is untalented, ungifted, unspecial. Someones high
opinion of themself, is their low opinion of others. A
point which is echoed in such peoples love of litigation,
as and when any newspaper dares print something nasty
about them, they set their lawyers upon such a paper like
frenzied dogs, with instructions to get everything they
can in compensation for such pain and suffering as was
inflicted upon them with the nasty name calling, and
horrid innuendoes. Meanwhile, in the real world, homeless
people lay strewn in the gutter, people sit in poverty
struggling to raise a family, and further afield people
die of starvation, malnutrition, poor sanitation etc. How
much compensation are they going to receive?
Though once again, as in all such instances,
these people believe in what they do, they believe that
they work hard, they believe that they deserve their
money, they earnt every penny, which just goes to show
what kind of a sheltered and pampered environment these
people come from. They've obviously never had to dig
holes in the road, they genuinely believe that singing/dancing/acting/just
about any first class form of employment you care to
mention is hard work (if there's anything hard to be done,
they pay people to do it for them), which is why we
always see the pop/film star bleating on about their
drink and drugs hell, how they hit rock bottom, read my
story, listen to my problems, and when asked for
photographic evidence of their time on the park bench,
drinking meths, with needles hanging out of their arms,
shouting abuse at passers by, with all the other down and
outs, they seem strangely quite. They didn't mean 'that'
rock bottom, more 'their' rock bottom, i.e. the time they
realised that if they didn't pull their finger out, they'd
have to start working for a living, and such a startling
prospect like that, absolutely scared the shit out of them.
The same principles are forthcoming everywhere
within society. For example, people who present holiday
programmes, with their annoying little claims of "Oh
you've got to work really hard. A lot of people think
that it's being paid to go on holiday, but it isn't".
Yes it bloody well is, and everyone saw the report as
proof. They were lying on a sun drenched beach living the
life of riley, and they got paid a large sum of money for
doing so. Therefore they get paid to go on holiday, and
going on holiday isn't hard, it's easy, what's more it's
good fun too. And if they seriously believe that such
activities are in some way hard, then they are clearly
out of their depth, in which case they should promptly
stand aside and make way for somebody who finds such activities easy.
It's a good job that structures as the economy
are not built upon work, if they were, then this country,
as would most, if not all others, would be bankrupt. It's
about power, and everything that entails, domination and
submission. Serving your master.
Which brings us back to freedom, you weren't
put on this planet to serve anyone, or anything. You were
put here to live life, and enjoy yourself. Something
which isn't truly possible within an environment which is
built upon the suffering of others. Obviously it's
possible, and commonplace, to experience momentary bouts
of happiness and joy, but true contentment can only be
forthcoming within an environment where there is no
suffering. Leading us on to the elusive communist state,
a place where true contentment may be found, with the
abolition of all the artificial levels of abuse that are
dished out upon the masses in the name of depravity.
Interestingly enough, we see a direct
comparison between the concepts of true Christianity, and
true communism, and the upholders of such principles,
true Christians and true communists. Which isn't really
surprising considering they are one and the same, each
coming packaged in the differing languages of religion,
and politics respectively. Both have been hounded, and
viewed, quite rightly, by the leaders of nations, as
being a threat to the very power that they wallow in. In
the historical instance of Christians, we see them being
thrown to the lions, and in the instance of communists,
we see the witch hunts of 50's America. In the instances
of the ideologies themselves, and those that have
corrupted the true message, we see the Christian ideology
being twisted to suit the colonialists of old, as they
set about conquering new nations, and 'civilising' the 'savages',
and indeed, their modern day counterparts in the Catholic,
and Protestant manifestations of the ideology, and their
fledgling spin offs. And we see the communist ideology
being twisted to fit the depraved desires, and
inadequacies of the Russians and Chinese. Furthermore, we
see that whilst the languages may have changed from
religion to politics, the basic ideals remain constant,
with the two extremities with regards society, and just
exactly which force is controlling that society, i.e. Heaven and Hell.
When looking at the concepts behind Hell, we
see a place of eternal suffering and misery, ruled over
by demons wallowing in the infliction of such suffering
upon the masses, as in capitalism. And looking at the
other end of the scale, we see the proverbial place of
eternal peace and happiness, free from pain and suffering,
as in communism. Looking around at the perfect example of
capitalism in all its depravity, we see the global
economy as being the best example of such principles.
With the deaths of tens of millions of innocent people
each and every single year, as they exist as nothing more
than a counterbalance for those proverbial perverts who
ride on their backs, sitting around manicly rubbing their
filthy little cocks, wallowing in a depraved society of
their own making. And at the other end of the scale, we
see the faint glimmering light of the elusive communist
state, where all men are equal, where true democracy is
the order of the day, where the communities involved
exist as families, working together to make a better
environment for themselves, and their children, where all
the artificially induced forms of human suffering have
been abolished for good.
This leads us on to the simple question of why
are things the way they are. Why aren't we all living in
such an idyllic environment now? Which brings us back
full circle to the beginning. Evolution.
Mankind is still in his infancy, and still
sits snugly around the lower levels of development.
People like to think that they are highly evolved and
civilised, and yet their actions are their true measure
of development. For example, we see people sitting in
restaurants gorging themselves on the flesh of dead
animals, they may be eating such a creature with the
right knife and fork, they may be drinking the right wine
to accompany the occasion, and they may well believe that
in doing so they are in some way civilised, developed,
highly evolved, and yet their actions are the conclusive
proof to the contrary. They are eating a dead animal, it
does not matter quite how they dress the occasion up,
eating a fellow higher life form is an act of the utmost
depravity. In evolutionary terms, mankind the species is
nothing more than an overcommunicative monkey. Looking
back on mankinds history, we see the emergence of witch
doctors, and cult leaders, each talking a complete load
of rubbish, and their respective followers swallowing it
all, hook line and sinker. Looking around today, we see
much the same, with hypnotists, psychics, clairvoyants,
faith healers, business men, politicians, yet more cult
leaders, each speaking new and different languages, yet
still playing the same old monkey power games.
This point of infantile levels of development
shows itself clearly when looking at the various
societies of the world. One can be forgiven for thinking
that the controllers of the various structures concerned
(politicians) are evil little creatures, hell bent on the
abuse of others, but they're not, it only seems that way
when anyone (in particular anyone of a higher level of
development, which pretty much covers most humans), is
forced to experience their actions. They're just
incompetent, inadequate morons. They don't really know
what they are doing, they like to think they do, but that's
just arrogance. They don't take into account the long
term effects of their actions, at least not over and
above the gain that they seek. They don't deliberately
set out to manufacture the levels of oppression and
subsequent poverty that they do, and everything that
entails, crime, prostitution, misery, etc. In exactly the
same way that the rapist doesn't deliberately set out to
fuck up the mind of his victim, he just wants to fuck her,
quite exactly what he has to do to her in order to
achieve his desire is exactly that, something he has to
do in order to get what he wants. They're genuinely
unaware of any levels of responsibility over and above
the gain that they seek, owing to their own inadequacies.
Never overestimate such creatures.
People like to think that they are highly
evolved and such forth, and they invariably make the
mistake of thinking that this is it, that they sit at the
pinnacle of the evolutionary scale, which they clearly
don't. Mankind is still evolving, and just as the people
of today look back upon the society of yesterday,
sneering at their stupidity, so the people of tomorrow
will look back upon the society of today with much the
same thoughts. Only where we only have old and gnarled
documents to look back upon, tomorrows society will have
videotape footage of all the current day perverts that
lead the worlds nations as we know them. The repulsive
politicians, who when asked why certain members of
society are refused health care, and left to die, proudly
quote figures and statistics, stating "Statistically
speaking, these people are better off now then ever
before, blah, blah, blah".
Looking back at communism, and the elusive
paradise state, we see that as big a job as it may sound,
adapting the entire structure of the nation, and
ultimately the world, in order for such principles to be
adopted, is the easy bit. By dumping the exact same
people within such an environment, as those that make up
this environment, ultimately nothing would have been
achieved, aside from a minor face lift. It would
undoubtedly only be a matter of time, before the same
people started playing the same old game, as one
community set out to dominate another, with their helpful
claims of "Sure, we can do this for you, what are
you going to do for us?", and back we are again,
with the emergence of 'favours', favours which
miraculously, seem to leave the people doing them with a
distinct surplus of cash. And even looking at the
internal activities of such a community, no doubt it
would only be a matter of time before the lobbying groups
put their two penneth in, telling everyone what they can
and can't do, what they can and can't see, what they can
and can't hear, what they can and can't say, and,
ultimately, what they can and can't think.
People are the way they are, as a direct
result of the environment within which they were raised,
and more importantly the levels of reward and punishment
they receive from within such an environment. And if they
are raised within a depraved environment, they then
become depraved. And with the effective grading of any
society being based upon those that make up that society,
the society, of which they are now a member, will be
depraved. Leading ultimately to a vicious circle. The
reason people are depraved, is because they are raised in
a depraved environment, and the reason the environment is
depraved is because it is made up of depraved individuals,
of which they are now one.
Which leads us back on to religion, and those
strange people like Jesus who pop up from time to time,
offering a helping hand up the evolutionary scale. The
kind of helping hand that is understandably missing from
the cults of today, be they officially recognised cults,
or officially recognised religions, offering false
promises and threats, along with afterlives and all sorts
of nonsense. You won't find any legitimate religious
experiences there, just a load of power crazed deviants,
thrusting forth images of all shapes, sizes and
descriptions, slamming them down upon the masses like the
satanic dictators they are.
The closest thing to a genuine religious
interaction may be seen in the example of a wise old man,
living in a cave. You can go there and ask any question
you so desire, and in return you will receive the answer.
Not what the old man wanted you to know, and maybe not
what you wanted to know. Just the answer to the question.
Thoughts, views, and opinions come ten a penny
in this world. There is only one truth. It can be twisted,
distorted, manipulated, and even denied. But it can never be destroyed.
Copyright Sean Copland 1995-2010
|